![]() ![]() ![]() Getting a bead on drones, soldiers, or any target that isn't as large as a van is next to impossible and switching on the auto-aim feature does little to fix this. Homefront: The Revolution is let down by almost everything else.įor one, the gunplay is floaty and imprecise. But while both Wolfenstein games were a joy to play, this isn't the case here. Its an interesting take on events, delving into what could have been if history took different turn, not too dissimilar to Wolfenstein: The New Order, and its expansion, Wolfenstein: The Old Blood. You have to free outposts from North Korean control, hack into communications networks, and try to win the hearts and minds of civilians who have more or less given up on life. ![]() The game puts you in the role of Ethan Brody, a member of a local resistance cell in Philadelphia. After making a host of hot-selling smartphones, Apex decided to venture into munitions - most of which America bought in droves without realising that there would be a backdoor that gives North Korea control of its army with a single button push, leading to the occupation of the US. ![]() Essentially, Steve Jobs is North Korean and Apple is called Apex. The set up for such an event is based in a rather cool premise that saw decades of innovation take place in the tiny nation instead of Silicon Valley. Homefront: The Revolution takes place in the near future where the US has been overrun by North Korea. But while id's first-person shooter rose past that to give us one of the better games of 2016, Homefront: The Revolution ends up feeling satanic despite using a well-worn formula for open-world gaming goodness. What does Homefront: The Revolution have in common with Doom (2016)? Both games have spent a substantial amount of time in development hell. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |